Prediction of Jurgen Melzer vs Nathan Healey Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Melzer vs N. Healey

Jurgen Melzer
AUT
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
44
Age
45
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
8
Best Rank
159
5
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.0M
Career Money
$111.2K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Nathan Healey
AUS
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
44
Age
45
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
8
Best Rank
159
5
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$4.0M
Career Money
$111.2K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Melzer 1 - 0 Healey
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jurgen Melzer winning 3 and Nathan Healey winning 0. The last match between Jurgen Melzer and Nathan Healey was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 20-01-2005, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Jurgen Melzer getting the victory 6-3 6-2 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Melzer | 1 |
| Healey | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Australian Open - Melbourne(01-20-05)
Jurgen Melzer
6
6
7
Nathan Healey
3
2
6
J. Melzer vs N. Healey H2H Profile
J. Melzer vs N. Healey Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jurgen Melzer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nathan Healey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jurgen Melzer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathan Healey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jurgen Melzer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathan Healey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jurgen Melzer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nathan Healey winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jurgen Melzer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 118/73), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 134/128). Nathan Healey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 36/22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 22/28).
- Player level: In the last year, Jurgen Melzer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nathan Healey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jurgen Melzer winning 1 times and Nathan Healey being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jurgen Melzer winning 3 and Nathan Healey winning 0.
- The last match between Jurgen Melzer and Nathan Healey was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 20-01-2005, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Jurgen Melzer getting the victory 6-3 6-2 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jurgen Melzer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nathan Healey has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jurgen Melzer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathan Healey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jurgen Melzer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathan Healey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jurgen Melzer vs Nathan Healey Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Melzer vs N. Healey H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 19 | Games Won | 11 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 72% (63/87) | 1st Serve % | 50% (39/78) |
| 83% (52/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (26/39) |
| 50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 40% (31/78) | Return Points Win % | 26% (23/87) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Melzer 0%, Healey 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Melzer 0%, Healey 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Melzer 0%, Healey 0%.
J. Melzer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(7) 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
N. Healey Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-3 7-6(1) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||

J. Melzer vs N. Healey Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.31% (504/424) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.89% (183/163) |
| 52.64% (1266/1139) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.31% (435/381) |
| 50.71% (11860/11528) | Games Win/Loss | 51.67% (4091/3827) |
| 51.15% (134/128) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.99% (115/98) |
| 52.32% (169/154) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.00% (22/28) |
| 60.48% (150/98) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (10/15) |
| 53.68% (51/44) | Grass Win/Loss | 62.07% (36/22) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 3144 | Aces Total | 208 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1648 | Total Double Faults | 196 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 534.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 493.14 |
| 63% (28979/46355) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1370/2374) |
| 70% (20212/28983) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (988/1370) |
| 51% (8873/17339) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (479/996) |
| 39% (1651/4210) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (70/204) |
| 37% (17216/46317) | Return Points Win % | 35% (804/2296) |
| 56.74% (80/61) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (11/11) |
| 42.36% (61/83) | Masters W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 43.14% (22/29) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 54.74% (231/191) | Main Tour W/L | 44.78% (30/37) |
| 65.24% (107/57) | Challenger W/L | 52.04% (102/94) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 69.64% (39/17) |
| 55% (414/754) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (176/327) |
| 50% (82/163) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 51% (200/396) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (63/143) |
| 55% (179/323) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (51/117) |
| 79% (501/397) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (192/157) |
| 21% (501/103) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (192/35) |
| 24% (426/104) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (154/25) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Mon, 24 Nov, 07:00 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionTue, 25 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 01:30 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 11:30 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

23 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Pablo Carreno-Busta Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

23 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Jaume Antoni Munar Clar Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, F, ITA – 23rd November 2025 Best Bets

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
18:00
H2H 0-1
09:05
H2H 0-0
11:30
H2H 0-0
13:00
H2H 0-0
13:00
H2H 0-0